The Triple Helix at Georgetown University

Abstract Guidelines

  • Abstracts will be due Friday, October 2nd, 2009, to submissions@georgetowntriplehelix.org. You will receive a confirmation email that we have received your abstract at that time.
  • Abstracts should be written in 100-300 words. Your abstract should outline your proposed topic and how you plan to outline your topic. You should also include relevant citations.
  • The Triple Helix is a journal which concerns the intersection between science, society, and public policy. Your articles topics should reflect this broad appeal. For sample topics, please visit http://www.thetriplehelix.org and click "Archives."
  • We are looking for new, interesting, innovative, and sharp angles to issues that have already been covered by national press. We are NOT looking for a mere summary of popular issues, though a background to your article is usually necessary.
  • Do not worry about being perfect! This is a learning process and we will help you through it with suggestions and guidance. Remember your abstracts are faculty and peer reviewed, so you will have a great deal of input as to how you can mold your ideas.
  • Even if you are describing a local event, your article can be snazzed up with interviews from cool people who attended, discussing the issues that were raised, presenting both sides of the issues, and writing about how your local issue plays into a grander national movement or is significant on a grander scale. (Make it sound appealing!)
  • While we encourage you to work with ideas that interest you, we are not looking for discussion of your own laboratory research.

Current Potential and Accepted Topics
*The following is only a list of suggested topics. Abstracts addressing other appropriate topics will also be considered. If you are uncertain about a topic not listed here that you would like to write about, please email us at submissions@georgetowntriplehelix.org.
  • Genetic Discrimination (Accepted)
  • A Comparative Look at ADHD: Is it Just an American Condition? (Accepted)
  • Directing Students to Clean Energy Jobs (Accepted)
  • Reforming Earmarks for University Construction (Accepted)
  • Recycling of Electronic Goods (Accepted)
  • Carbon Markets (Accepted)
  • Comparative Health Care Coverage (Accepted)
  • Elimination of Trans Fats in US Restaurants (Accepted)
  • Emergency Medical Response to a Nuclear 9/11(Accepted)
  • Consequences of the Trade and Consumption of Bushmeat in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Urgency for Sustainable Alternatives (Accepted)
  • Caffeine regulation/labeling (Accepted)
  • Math and science education internationally: how the US fares and the basis of evaluation
  • Paying children to learn: its use in US cities and its success; what problems does it create?
  • "Healthy People 2010": an analysis of the Surgeon General's plan
  • Millennium Developmental Goals 2015: description, analysis, and evaluation
  • Tuberculosis: drug-resistant strains
  • Wind power: on- and offshore developments in the US (e.g., Delaware); potential comparison with other nations
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH): compensation for radiation risks
  • National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA): analysis
  • Endangered Species Act: analysis of political influences
  • Research & development in the pharmaceutical industry: current slowdown in pipeline
  • AIDS: world vaccine failure
  • Pharmaceutical advertising: current regulation, etc.